Have your say on the priorities that matter most to you

In December, students from across the University came together at the first Student Assembly to talk honestly about their experiences. Alongside the insight we've been gathering over the first semester, those conversations helped identify six key areas that students are facing right now.

We are now asking you to help decide what the Students' Union should focus on next and what priorities we move forward with in the New Era.

Voting runs from 12th January to 31st January

What you are voting on:

Based on student discussions, six priority areas were identified:

  • Cost of living and studying
  • Access and disability support
  • Placements
  • Facilities
  • Teaching
  • Timetabling

Your vote will help narrow these down to three priorities that will shape the Students' Union's campaigning and influence work.

All priorities remain important. However, the top three will be the focus of the SU’s available resources, while the remaining three can continue to move forward with the support and involvement of students.

Your stories matter

Voting is only part of the process. The comments section of our voting system is just as important

We want to hear:

  • What your experience has been
  • How these issues affect you day to day
  • What you think needs to change
  • Any ideas or solutions you would like the University or Students' Union to explore

Comments are anonymous to other students, but staff can see who has written them so we can offer support if needed.

Once you've voted, share this with your coursemates and communities.

What happens next

Once voting closes on 31st January, the top three priorities will be confirmed.

Thank you for taking the time to vote and share your story.

If you have any questions, contact us at suinformation@lancashire.ac.uk or message us on social media @lancashire_su

Back to list
  • 63 up votes 0 down votes
    63 voters

    Theme: Teaching

    Current

      Theme: Teaching

       

      We've been listening to Students, and we shared this listening at the assembly…

      “There is little time between learning and assessments… students don’t have time during Freshers week….”

      “Teacher bias needs to end… lecturers don’t give proper feedback… assignment briefs need to be clearer.”

      “Students felt poorly supported when moving from undergraduate to postgraduate… induction too generic.”

      “Some lecturers don’t like Asian students. We get marked lower and the feedback is awful.”

      “Lecturers don’t challenge inappropriate comments. Cultural sensitivity is basically ignored.”

      “Lecture delivery is often too fast, especially when introducing new terminology, making it difficult to follow.”

      “Slides lack key information, meaning students must combine PowerPoints with additional reading to understand essential content.”

      “Students request lecture content to be released in advance, as previously agreed.”

       

      At the assembly, we heard powerful stories from students about the challenges they faced with:

      Student 1 – Postgraduate School of Psychology

      Lack of induction for postgraduate students, especially those new to the University of Lancashire. Additionally, they experience unclear instructions for assessments, with conflicting information being presented in different sources. This has caused them to feel unsure about their work and ability to engage with the course and left them questioning their academic confidence. They also worry about neurodivergent students, who may require additional clarity in assessment briefs.

      Student 2 – Law and Policing Student

      This student is struggling with the competitive nature of the course, and financial hardship makes them feel like they are struggling to keep up with their peers. The course and students in the course establish high expectations for opportunities and performance. They feel unfairly treated due to the atmosphere in the course cohort.

      Student 3 - School of Business

      They are experiencing a lack of support with technical issues, and students are being referred to other departments without really getting help. Lecturers do not seem to know how to manage technology related to recordings, which are important for students to study. The university does not provide straightforward information on assignments and teaching, which is extremely inconsiderate, generally, but specifically for disabled and neurodivergent students. More feedback on coursework would be helpful to help students with progression.

      Student 4 – International Student

      As a transfer student, they came to the University of Lancashire to gain international experience. However, they felt a significant drop in teaching quality. Due to this, they feel like their attendance was not necessary, as lectures often consisted of watching videos they could have watched in their own time at home.

       

      We can see from this insight that students are experiencing issues with:

      • Limited time between teaching and assessments, particularly during transition periods
      • Unclear assessment briefs and inconsistent guidance
      • Variable quality of teaching and lecture delivery
      • Lack of timely, constructive feedback on coursework
      • Insufficient induction and support for postgraduate and transitioning students
      • Concerns about bias, cultural insensitivity, and inclusive practice in teaching
      • Limited access to learning materials in advance, including lecture slides and recordings

      (These examples come directly from student stories and listening sessions. They are shared as insight to inform how you might vote on the future priorities of the Union. Following this vote, we will bring together those students interested in progressing work and taking action on the priorities to decide the issues and next steps.)

    2:52pm on 12 Jan 26 What does everyone think about the ethics process? Not exactly teaching I know but it's part of a lot of people's studies. In my experience it was too long winded and actually delayed my studies (I'm a PhD student). Obviously it's important to have an ethics process but I think it needs streamlining and to be more efficient. Any thoughts?
    10:25am on 15 Jan 26 You can't appeal a mark if you think your tutor is biased...because of academic judgement - no offence, but a tutor having a certain opinion of student is not academic...it is personal. Students being told not to worry about mistakes in exam papers, being taught different methods by tutors, not having access to recorded teaching which is a necessity for so many different student communities! Widening Participation Institutes need to widen the ways in which students participate - not just be using them as buzz words

    Other ways to get involved

    If you're keen to get involved in the Students' Union in other ways, you can also Join a Community and Become a Community Leader.

    Is there anything wrong with this page? Let us know